Three Strikes Law Research Paper Three strikes law in American legislation turned into a very contraversary issue in American society and in legislature of separate states as it created an excellent soil for a number of political speculations on the hand with serious issues in criminology and court practices. Three strikes law is a category of statutes, which demand from courts compulsory and extended terms of incarceration, to those criminals who have convicted in serious crimes of 3 or more separate occasions.
By Tami Kamin Meyer Posted on Tuesday, November 6, In the fall ofI was thrilled to be hired for a freelance writing opportunity that suited me perfectly.
As a longtime practicing attorney and freelance writer, I relish writing posts where I can marry my passions of law and writing. Not long into my tenure, I started noticing typographical and grammatical errors had been edited into my articles prior to publication.
For example, misplaced commas were inserted in my copy, transforming an otherwise well-structured sentence into a stilted, sometimes convoluted mess.
When I was younger and less experienced, I sometimes reddened when editors red-lined dating myself here content that called for improvement. Fortunately, I am no longer so wedded to my words. As time went on, I continued to notice odd insertions in my articles.
Oftentimes, my polite inquiries to my editor were ignored. It is my name on that byline and I was determined to get those errors corrected quickly. Eventually I found the right person to make the fixes, no questions asked.
That person was in IT, however. It quickly became apparent I was not only going to have to read my articles immediately upon being posting online, but I was going to have to ask the IT person to make corrections. The editor never once questioned me about it, although a few times I expressed frustration to her and our boss.
As annoying as this became, I enjoyed the work so much that I decided to take the good with the bad. At least I had found a way to minimize the damage. I was looking forward to the piece and soon as it was posted online, I clicked onto it. My heart palpitated, but not out of joy.
Along with the usual inserted grammatical errors, it included facts that, due to my research, I believed to be untrue. OK, wait a minute, I told myself. Because I was on Eastern Standard Time and my coworkers were in California, I figured they were still in the middle of their workday.
For the time being, I gave her the benefit of the doubt that in an effort to strengthen my article, she inserted information pertinent to my piece that somehow, I had not found. I could not, in good conscience, let that happen. I logged onto the company web site to contact the IT person to make the needed changes.
Much to my chagrin, neither he nor the editor were logged in. The weekend was fast approaching and the article could not continue to circulate as posted. Fortunately, the company CEO logged on. I frantically reached out to him, requesting an immediate edit of my piece.
He asked how the article was incorrect. I responded in detail, and he made the required edits. Fortunately, the corrections showed up immediately.
While I was thrilled the article was fixed, I recognized the problem itself had not been. I asked him how he felt about inaccurate information being purposefully injected into articles. He brushed my concerns aside, responding the situation had been resolved.
How, I asked, could he keep an editor who was clearly adding incorrect, unsubstantiated content into articles? He responded he was extremely busy, and that if I had an issue with the editor, I should take it to her directly.
I did just that. She worked part time so I waited until Tuesday to email her, when I knew she would be in. I worded my missive carefully, asking politely if she could please provide me with the source of inaccurate information. I informed her I had not been able to substantiate the content, so I was curious where it came from.
No response, despite it being obvious she had been on the company site at the time. I contacted my boss again, informing him I tried to discuss the matter with the editor, to no avail.
It was already Wednesday, and my next deadline for the site was fast approaching.Top 10% Absolutely Positively the Best 30 Death Penalty Websites on the Internet (Top 1%) Death Penalty Information Center Probably the single most comprehensive and authoritative internet rersource on the death penalty, including hundreds of anti-death penalty articles, essays, and quotes on issues of deterrence, cost, execution of the innocent, racism, public opinion, women, juveniles.
I went to a dinner party at a friend’s home last weekend, and met her five-year-old daughter for the first time. Little Maya was all curly brown hair, doe-like dark eyes, and adorable in her shiny pink nightgown.
Sep 21, · The Shang, Zhou, Qin, And Han Dynasties The Shang, chuck, Qin, and Han dynasties The Shang dynasty was founded in BC. It was the second hereditary dynasty in mainland China. Legal brief essay-3 strikes case; The essay is about the democrats and their ideals Spanish and English Colonization Compare and Contr.
A ccess, whether to someone or to something, is a valuable commodity these days. For sports fans, it might be a sideline pass for the Super Bowl, a box seat on the finish line at the Kentucky Derby or an invitation to step inside the ropes at the Ryder Cup.
initiativeblog.com is the place to go to get the answers you need and to ask the questions you want. The Case for Reparations. Two hundred fifty years of slavery. Ninety years of Jim Crow. Sixty years of separate but equal. Thirty-five years of racist housing policy.